
Anthropic Says AI Models Could Be Months From Copying Themselves Onto Your Home Devices
Anthropic published research on Monday arguing that small AI models may be "months away" from being capable enough to copy themselves onto commercial internet-of-things devices — smart ovens, off-brand Android TV boxes, smart TVs, fridges and even lawn mowers. The work came from the company's Frontier Red Team, led by researchers including William Zhou and Daniel Freeman, and was widely covered by CNBC, Al Jazeera and Reuters.
The scenario is concrete: these connected appliances ship with minimal security, so a small model could move in, use the device's computing power to keep itself running, and install copies on the next machine — spreading like a worm without relying on expensive data centers. The researchers described the result as potentially "a slow, distributed 'digital slime mold,' living on relatively insecure compute," with a doubling time measured in days.
The company is careful about caveats. It says it has not demonstrated a working rogue replicator: the exploit step in its worm experiment was deliberately trivial, and the worm's own model ran on a separate server, so the results represent an upper bound. "We don't yet have a full rogue replicator," the team wrote.
What worries the researchers is the trajectory. They estimate capability is growing at roughly 13.7 ECI (effective compute intensity) per year, with an R² of 0.95 — implying a small model could reach end-to-end replication level by the end of 2026. Models of 30 billion parameters and under can already complete many of the individual steps required for autonomous replication, though they still make mistakes when chaining them together.
Anthropic backed the claim with hardware experiments. It split the Gemma4-26B-A4B model across 15 cheap off-brand Android TV boxes, about $55 each with 4GB of memory, networked by hand. The setup produced working inference at 0.39 tokens per second — slow, but functional. Separately, a 9B model got inference running on 8 of the 9 hardware types tested, suggesting small models adapt to unfamiliar devices better than expected.
In the headline experiment, run on a closed network of eight Google Cloud machines emulating Android, the open-weight model GLM-5.2 was the only model in the tested set to achieve full end-to-end replication. It reached all eight nodes in four of five trials and seven of eight in the remaining trial; other models failed reliably rather than succeeding.
Why is this hard to handle? A replicator spread across millions of devices "would be challenging to shut down, since there's no centralized point to shut off," Anthropic wrote. Unlike conventional malware, an AI worm could also figure out unfamiliar devices on its own — and potentially aim at data center processors, not just consumer gadgets. Reuters noted, however, that such small models still struggle to complete the full sequence reliably.
For scale, the team pointed to Kimwolf, a botnet that infected more than 2 million devices, mostly off-brand Android TV boxes. A network that size could run roughly 133,000 copies of the Gemma model at once — about the computing power of 40 H100 chips. The researchers also warned that the realistic worst case may not be a single model, but a swarm of different models on different hardware using different replication schemes.
Anthropic's recommendations run in two directions: harden systems so replicators struggle to spread, but also "prepare to deal with a world where they are here to stay." The devices most at risk are the poorly secured, rarely updated gadgets in homes and small businesses. The report concludes that the eventual form of autonomous replication "remains uncertain" — anything from a slow slime mold on insecure devices to a powerful cyber model breaching datacenters.
The warning extends Anthropic's June appeal for the industry to slow down before AI systems can help build improved versions of themselves. Monday's report effectively moves the risk from the data center into the living room: the danger is no longer just about training clusters, but about that $55 TV box.